[This article from 7 July is frequently updated, last: 6 August 2020.
Please REFRESH your browser before reading.]
We focussed too much on the novel coronavirus and lost sight of everything else.
Being obsessed about avoiding death,
we lose our lives.
| Content on this page below: |
|---|
| • Why did we want to stop the virus? Farr’s Law of Epidemics • The notoriously wrong model by Ferguson, Imperial College • Coronaviruses are seasonal • People are four times more likely to survive WITHOUT a ventilator • The cytokine storm needs to be addressed • Lockdown prevents population immunity • Vitamin C could help coronavirus patients • Lockdown, social isolation and loneliness kill. • Anxiety from reactions to COVID-19 will destroy lives • Staying home leads to “sunshine” vitamin D deficiency • Staying at & working from home, using zoom and on-line orders • “False Alarm” (German Interior Ministry analysis conclusion) • NHS letter to “At Risk Patients” • Lockdown deaths are not covid deaths • 20 000 unexplained deaths in senior care facilities • 200,000 people could die as a result of lockdown • Our western “modern” medicine focusses on treating symptoms • Media use the power of images • The pharmaceutical industry is the biggest donor to political parties • How a False Hydroxychloroquine Narrative Was Created • The anti-placebo effect of fear • Our children are traumatised and suffer • Counting covid-19 deaths • We don’t need more testing • The dodgy “R value” • Natural immunity after Covid-19 infection • Test accuracy • Pandemic reactions out of proportion • French study • Decision makers were too afraid to “return to normal” • Learning from history: “DDT is good for me” • LINKS |
Why did we think we need to stop this virus?
We humans have evolved with viruses and have more viruses in us than body cells. The dance between our immune system and the virus usually ends with our immune system learning a new skill, getting more resilient and long term protection – and the virus is retreating and mutating.
Farr’s Law of Epidemics states that epidemics tend to rise and fall in a roughly symmetrical pattern or bell-shaped curve.
“Expansion begins exponentially but fades quickly after about eight weeks,” Professor Yitzhak Ben Israel
Neil Ferguson, mathematical biology professor at Imperial College London, has a track record of wrong predictions. His 2001 model of mad cow disease predicted fatalities up to 150,000 deaths in England, when in fact only 177 people died until 2020 1, but 6 million cows and sheep were culled.
2005 he said: “up to 200 million people could be killed by the bird flu“
Reality check: less than 200 died.
Prof. Ferguson predicted 8 million in hospital and 500 000 deaths for the UK due to coronavirus. Why did our government trust that scientist who used his 13 year old catastrophic model again, which paved the way to the Coronavirus Bill and the 2020 lockdown?
Coronaviruses are seasonal just like the flu, peaking January to March in the northern hemisphere [see “Human coronavirus circulation in the United States 2014-2017” and the Glasgow study 2005-2013.
Viruses stay a few weeks before they mutate and disappear and natural herd immunity is achieved.
Covid-19 may be new, but it is still part of the coronavirus family.
from “Human coronavirus circulation in the United States 2014-2017“
Ventilators: wrong and deadly
Did we need more ventilators to treat covid patients?
Clearly not. The medical and research community should have known what was killing people with SARS in 2003. It wasn’t viral pneumonia. It was their own immune systems in overdrive in a so-called “cytokine storm” that can be more deadly than the virus itself. [source ]
A study published in JAMA April 22 describing the outcomes for 5,700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area reported:
“Mortality rates for those who received mechanical ventilation
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/05/06/adverse-effects-of-mechanical-ventilation.aspx
in the 18-to-65 and older-than-65 age groups were 76.4% and 97.2%, respectively. Mortality rates for those in the 18-to-65 and older-than-65 age groups who did not receive mechanical ventilation were 19.8% and 26.6%, respectively. There were no deaths in the younger-than-18 age group.”
People are four times more likely to survive WITHOUT a ventilator
The cytokine storm needs to be addressed. Not the virus. Yet all the focus was on anti-viral medications that would do nothing to address the immune system dysfunction.
Neither the “Health” Ministry, not the media were telling the public anything about the immune system – it was all about “the virus” and “there is no treatment” and “only a vaccine can help”; none of this is true.
By March 2020, we had evidence, that high doses of Vitamin C could help coronavirus patients in Wuhan and Shanghai [see also http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v16n14.shtml and https://covid19data.com/2020/03/04/expert-consensus-on-comprehensive-treatment-of-coronavirus-disease-in-shanghai-2019/]
Lockdown Isolation & Loneliness
“Social relationships, or the relative lack thereof, constitute a major risk factor for health—rivaling the effect of well established health risk factors such as cigarette smoking, blood pressure, blood lipids, obesity and physical activity”
“social relationships influence the health outcomes of adults and should take social relationships as seriously as other risk factors that affect mortality, the researchers conclude.” [Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review]
“There is robust evidence that social isolation and loneliness significantly increase risk for premature mortality, and the magnitude of the risk exceeds that of many leading health indicators,”
“Loneliness and social isolation are twice as harmful to physical and mental health as obesity”
Loneliness contributes to higher rates of heart disease, cancer, high blood presssure, diabetes, infection, anxiety, depressio, insomnia, addiction and suicide.
Isolating old people from their friends, families, children and grand children is heartless and cruel. No soldier in combat will be left alone to die by his comrades – but we let our old people die without their loved ones around.
Anxiety from reactions to COVID-19 will destroy at least seven times more years of life than can be saved by lockdowns.
The study, conducted by Just Facts, computed based on a broad array of scientific data that stress is one of the deadliest health hazards in the world, and stay-at-home orders, business shutdowns, media frenzy, as well as legitimate concerns about the virus can ultimately cost more lives than lockdowns can save.
“By choosing to lockdown, policymakers are choosing the greater of two evils, not the lesser.”
the non-covid deaths at home have increased significantly
The NHS wrote a letter to “At Risk Patients” living at their home with the following instructions:
– Try not to see anyone face-to face for at least 12 weeks
– keep 3 steps (2metres) between you and other people in your home
– Sleep in a different bed from other people if you can
– Try not to use the kitchen at the same time as other people
– If possible, eat by yourself in your room
– Try to keep yourself well and happy
These instructions feel more like punishment and isolation torture;
how can anyone hope to uplift an elderly person’s spirit with that?
Lockdown prevents the development
of population immunity, prolonging the problem.
It is a rigid overreaction of the political system,
just like the cytokine storm of the immune system.
Staying at home, using zoom and ordering on-line orders is an unhealthy form of torture
These goveernment instructions led to an increase of time spent in front of computer and TV screens, including for children. This has a negative effect on healthy sleep, eye sight and healthy child development.
The increased exposure to mass media manipulation increases fear and stress, reduces creativity and phantasy, resulting in apathy.
“no hope, no future” – passive giving up people feeling victimised…
We are coaxed to turn into zoombies.
On top of the negative screen impact on health, this cyber time is lost for a REAL experience of nature and other people.
On-line shopping has skyrocket, and amazon and other big tax dodging companies’ make enormous profits – while the local High Streets and small business are facing a financial abyss.
Lockdown Deaths
The majority of “covid deaths” were actually “lockdown deaths”
a shocking analysis Lockdown Deaths, Not Covid Deaths by the UK Column revealed on 14 July.
“The lockdown regime was detrimental to the health of the very demographic it was supposedly designed to ‘keep safe.”
Whether by design or criminal neglect, lockdown policy has actively targeted the most vulnerable, singling them out for unusual and cruel treatment. Premature mortality is the inevitable and obvious result.”
Statistics world wide show a precise and exact correlation between the start of lockdowns and significant rises in overall mortality
If health authorities vastly underestimated the prevalence of the virus at the beginning of the pandemic, why did the virus nevertheless wait until lockdowns were imposed to suddenly start killing at levels which exceeded normal deaths?
The British Medical Journal reports 20 000 unexplained deaths in senior care facilities of elderly people in the UK in April and May, ON TOP OF the 10 000 deaths labelled with coronavirus.
Clearly, the aim to “protect the vulnerable and over 70s” was not achieved.
“As national restrictions were imposed, experts from the Department of Health, the Office of National Statistics (ONS), the government’s Actuary Department and the Home Office forecast the collateral damage from delays to healthcare and the effects of recession arising from the pandemic response.
It estimated that in a reasonable worst case scenario, around 50,000 people would die from coronavirus in the first six months of the pandemic, with mitigation measures in place.
The report published in April calculated that up to 25,000 could die from delays to treatment in the same period and a further 185,000 in the medium to long term – amounting to nearly one million years of life lost.” From Telegraph.co.ukk 19 July and 20 July on Metro.co.uk
Staying home leads to “sunshine” vitamin D deficiency,
increasing chances of getting asthma & wheezing, influenza, tuberculosis, depression, schizophrenia, high blood pressure & coronary heart disease, type 1 diabetes, steoporosis, rickets, muscle wreakness & aches, Crohn’s Disease, multiple Sclerosis, reumatoid arthritis and cancer.
The UK government caused avoidable illness and deaths by instructing people to stay home.
Conclusion of the German Interior Ministry Crisis Management KM4
“False Alarm” (7 May 2020)
- The information about the dangers is incomplete and only deal with a narrow segment of the danger’s complexity. Without a proper assessment of the situation, appropriate measures cannot be efficient. Politicians had little chance to make apropriate decisions
- There is no evidence that this is more than a false alarm. There has been no increased danger for the population. Most people dying would have died anyway later this year. The danger of Covid-19 has been exagerated. It is likely we have a global false alarm situation. This conclusion was checked by KM4 and is in alliance with the data provided by RKI [Robert Koch Institut].
- The crisis management did not have tools to stop and revoke the state of emergency when it became clear, that the damage of the emergency procedures would be bigger than their benefit.
- The collective damage is already higher than the benefit, which is reflected in the casualties outnumbering the virus deaths
- The damage caused by the coronacrisis for the whole society is already gigantic; most of it will show in the near and far future; we cannot stop it any more, but may be able to limit it.
- The resilience of complex and interdependent essential infrastructures of our society has deteriorated, leaving our society more vulnerable to future crisises.
- The state implemented protection measures have lost any sense by now, but are still in place, and should be lifted ASAP to prevent additional deaths and to stabilise the complex interdependent critical infrastructures.
- The incompetence and mistakes of the crisis management with inconsistent and contradicting information have caused a disinformation of the population, and might be peceived as not trustworthy.
[the above text is a shortened translated summary of the German summary of the crisis analysis] – here is an article in English.
The analysis results were too embarrassing for the government – it needed a whistleblower to publish it. The 93 page German original is here.
The situation in Britain is similar to the findings of this analysis.
Professor Haditsch, Austria, said the following on 20 June
at the ACU (Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee):
“It should also become visible for all,
- that the German health care system has never even been close to running the risk of decompensating, i.e. being overburdened;
- that measurement figures, such as the doubling rate and this dreadful number “R 0”, had the primary purpose of creating fear and putting pressure on the population, and were communicated in an unobjective and manipulative way for lack of reference to the number of tests carried out;
- that false and untrustworthy fatality figures have been misused for intimidation purposes;
- that the number of cases was already significantly declining well before the lockdown;
- that a general mask-wearing obligation ordered 4 weeks later, I repeat 4 weeks later, was factually unfounded, unlawful and psycho-socially irresponsible;
- that the incorrigible sticking to measures and already refuted statements, i.e. against better knowledge and proven evidence, is a criminal offence in this context; and
- that ultimately a drastic change in the party-political decision-making structures is overdue because this is the only way to reliably prevent this anti-democratic approach from being continued or repeated.”
Saving the NHS?
Our western “modern” medicine focusses on treating symptoms rather than finding the cause of an illness, and often creates long term unhealthy side effects. Reducing the fever sabotages the natural immune system at work and supports the disease. Antibiotcs severely damage the biome, home of the immune system, and a complex and well balanced rain forest like environment. The result is often a short term improvement with a long term weaker health condition or causing other diseases to develop.
On top of this systemic imbalance, almost 1,000 patients die needlessly in UK NHS hospitals every month because of basic errors by medical staff
(UK study July 2012)
The Media and Bias
The media: “the first casualty in a war situation is the Truth”
At a time where 19 out of 20 news items in the main stream media revolve around the coronavirus, and Google, Facebook and Youtube, evenTwitter and Vimeo, are selectively removing content damaging their financial interests from their platforms, or labelling content with true, partly true or false warnings, fake and biased news.
Media are biased toward their financial supporters, like the Guardian receiving money from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
The pharmaceutical industry is the biggest donor to political parties in the US;
in the current unprecidented economic crisis, we can safely assume, that big companies and corporations find ways to secure their survival, through lobbying politicians and influencing media for their advantage – while small companies and businesses struggle to survive.
We should ensure that the media do not use the power of images to generate emotions that influence our judgment. If you get pictures of coffins and death departments from Italy or pictures of completely empty shelves, then their effects exceed the facts mentioned.
| “Virus Mania is a social disease of our highly developed society. To cure it will require conquering fear, fear being the most deadly contagious virus, most efficiently transmitted by the media.” [Etienne de Harven, pathologist] |
Even though the COVID-19 curve has been flattened,
mainstream media outlets continue to push doomsday predictions of an impending explosion of deaths
• According to Stanford University’s disease prevention chairman Dr. John Ioannidis, the COVID-19 fatality rate for those under the age of 45 is “almost zero,” and between the ages of 45 and 70, it’s somewhere between 0.05% and 0.3%
• So, the fact that young and middle-aged adults are testing positive in droves is not a warning sign of an impending onslaught of deaths, as the risk of death in these age groups is minuscule
• According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the COVID-19 mortality — which had declined for the last 10 weeks straight — “is currently at the epidemic threshold,” meaning if it declines just a little more, COVID-19 will no longer be considered an epidemic [14 July 2020]
The Spanish Flu was different
Some previous pandemics were caused by vulcanic eruptions leading to obscured sunshine resulting in food shortages and vitamin D deficiencies.
Spanish Flu casualties were partly due to administration of aspirin, which lowers the fever (“shooting the immune system in the food”) and impedes on the vitamin C absobtion in the body (vitamin C was not discovered yet), which is a fatal combination for stressed malnourished bodies fighting an infection.
Dr. Alan Palmer writes:
“More important than the pathogen is the resistance of the host:
In the late 1800s and early 1900s, infectious disease ravaged the large cities here and in Europe. Small Pox, Dysentery, Cholera, Diphtheria, the Spanish Flu and even Measles were very deadly. During that time period, livestock, horses, dogs and other animals walked down the streets, defecating and urinating as they went. The cities were greatly over-crowded. There was no efficient way to dispose of human and animal waste, the air was putrid, the water unclean, the food supply providing only basic needs and most people smoked and chewed tobacco. People’s bodies were living petri dishes, crawling with pathogenic (harmful) organisms, disease causing bacteria, parasites, viruses and fungi. Their “terrain” was fertile soil, ripe for infection as their immune systems were weak and overwhelmed.”
Today we still find similar conditions and malnutrition in third world countries. For example: vitamin A deficiency is a common condition that contributes to illness, blindness, and death.
In today’s “modern” world, we face different problems: pollution and contaminated processed foods weaken the immune system, and life expectancy in the US is going DOWN – that should be a warning.
Politics of Fear – the Stockholm Syndrome
The UK government, supported by the media, creates a lot of fear and uncertainty through contradicting instructions which “do not seem to make any sense.” There is no political opposition or questioning of the lockdown, as a war style situation is created with help of the media who thrive in conflict situations, and the message “we are all in this together” signal: “if you don’t do what we say, you endanger the lives of all of us”
Psychologically, this situation can be described as “The Stockholm Syndrome“, where hostages / victims begin to bond with their kidnappers / abusers, in order to save their lives. Being in a manipulative relationship can cause cognitive dissonance (“this doesn’t make sense”). This means the victim’s intuition has been damaged, and they may be confused about reality. Victims of Stockholm syndrome can become dedicated to a cause or an unspoken desire. They may over-identify with the perpetrator in a dysfunctional way in order to fulfill a personal need. This is the “hook.”
A very clever political strategy.
How to Help People Who May Have Stockholm Syndrome
Below are some quotes from the UK government advisory committee SAGE, showing psychological manipulation methods:
Much fear and panic was created around this new virus, contributing to stress and dis-ease. This led to the acceptance of the government’s lockdown.
On March 19th, a French study “SARS-CoV-2: Fear Versus Data” was published, concluding: “There does not seem to be a significant difference between the mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 in OECD countries and that of common coronaviruses” and: “Fear could have a larger impact than the virus itself”
On the same day, the British government decided: “COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious diseases (HCID) in the UK”, but a few days later they ordered a lockdown and voted on a Bill spanning a period of two years. TWO YEARS, for a seasonal virus?
By the time it turned out the virus was not so dangerous, the decision makers seemed too afraid to admit this and return to normal.
Due to lockdown and “flattening the curve”, we haven’t achieved the level of herd immunity yet, so some people will catch up with the virus later.
The anti-placebo effect of fear
Just like any medication and placebo works better, when people believe in them, any virus will make people more ill when they fear it.
Fear induces stress, which disables the immune system, which makes people more receptive to any infection.
Fear intoxicates our common sense, and especially those who have locked themselves in have been exposed to multiple repeated slogans on all channels to be scared.
Coronaviruses regularly recur in dogs, cats, pigs, mice, bats and in humans, and after all Covid-19 is part of the coronavirus family.
How to set up a HCQ study to fail
WHO, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust and the U.K. government used wrong dosage and missed a main ingredient in their studies – How a False Hydroxychloroquine Narrative Was Created
• The U.K. Recovery Trial— Funded in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust and the U.K. government through Oxford University, this study randomly assigned patients to usual care or to one of five primary drug treatments: lopinavir-ritonavir; a corticosteroid (low-dose dexamethasone); hydroxychloroquine; tociizumab; or azithromycin. They also used convalescent plasma.
Patients received 2,400 mg of hydroxychloroquine during the first 24 hours — three to six times higher than the daily dosage recommended followed by 400 mg every 12 hours for nine more day for a cumulative dose of 9,200 mg over 10 days. The trial ended its hydroxychloroquine arm on June 4, reporting “no benefit.”
• The Solidarity Trial — Launched by the World Health Organization and funded by 43 countries and 203,000 individuals and organizations, this trial also compares standard of care against four drug options, including hydroxychloroquine, among patients in 35 countries.
the Canadian and Norwegian portions of the trial lists a dosage of 2,000 mg on the first day, and a cumulative dose of 8,800 mg over 10 days. This is only 400 mg less than the U.K.32 Recovery Trial’s toxic dose.
…the study was retracted for using fabricated data, (and this despite having undergone peer-review), the hydroxychloroquine arm was restarted.
June 17, 2020, the hydroxychloroquine arm was stopped again, this time “based on evidence from the Solidarity trial, U.K.’s Recovery trial and a Cochrane review of other evidence on hydroxychloroquine.”
• The REMAP-CAP Trial (Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial Adaptive Platform Trial for Community-Acquired Pneumonia)39 — Here, patients either received nothing, a combination of lopinavir and ritonavir, or hydroxychloroquine alone or in combination with lopinavir and ritonavir.
REMAP used the same toxic dose as the Recovery Trial but for six days instead of 10. What’s more, only critically ill hospitalized patients were included in this trial..
All three trials above that used toxic hydroxychloroquine doses also failed to include zinc, which appears to be a key factor; the hydroxychloroquine is really only used to drive the zinc in to the cells.
[from How a False Hydroxychloroquine Narrative Was Created]
By using the WRONG dose, the WHO, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust and the U.K. government caused avoidable deaths.
Children and Covid-19
Our children are severely affected: “Socially isolated children were at significant risk of poor adult health compared with nonisolated children… longitudinal findings showed that chronic social isolation across multiple developmental periods had a cumulative, dose-response relationship to poor adult health”
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/205331
[Study August 2006: Socially Isolated Children 20 Years Later – Risk of Cardiovascular Disease]
will suffer psychologically and emotionally for decades to come
A Dureham teacher reported, that 5 out of 70 children he has been teaching via zoom did well – but the 65 others were really struggling and did not like on-line learning.
It looks like trouble is brewing up in the current school generation.
Social distancing and isolation destroys children
• Developed 70 years ago by the CIA to break down enemies of state.
• It is the equivalent of smoking 15 cigarettes a day AND being an alcoholic.
• It doubles the risk of death, and destroys the part of the brain responsible for learning.
Who would recommend doing THAT to our children?
Covid-19 Deaths and Statistics
Since the Coronavirus Bill was passed on 25 March, proper post mortem examinations are not required any more, and the real reason of death and underlying conditions may never be found out. The WHO guidelines allow using the emergency ICD-10 code “U07. COVID-19” as cause of death, if no virus was identified. www.who.int/classifications/icd/covid19/en/
This covid death count is basically useles.
An Italian post morten examination found over 95% of covid-19 deaths had underlying conditions likely being the cause of death.
Italian hospitals are the worst in Europe; an analysys from 2015 showed, that over 10 700 people died in Italian hospitals due to hospital aquired antibiotic resistant pathogens in one year.
Prominent forensic medicine professor Klaus Püschel, Hamburg, Germany, has vast experience in autopsying individuals who have died with the Chinese coronavirus:
“All [COVID-19] deaths for this region, which have now passed 100, have been autopsied, and each one had serious pre-existing diseases. The average age is 80 years old.”
“I think it’s really completely inappropriate when a president tells his people that we are at war, or when the German chancellor compares the situation with the last world war.”
The UK ONS: Where only COVID-19 was recorded on the death certificate, or COVID-19 and subsequent conditions caused by COVID-19 were recorded, we refer to these deaths as having “No pre-existing conditions”.
Who decides this? It is VERY likely, that the conditions which actually caused the death, may never appear in the statistics, leaving the impression that coronavirus was the cause of death.
Why are Public Health England NOT counting covid recovered cases like the other countries?
[from Why no-one can ever recover from COVID-19 in England – a statistical anomaly
By this PHE definition, no one with COVID in England is allowed to ever recover from their illness. A patient who has tested positive, but successfully treated and discharged from hospital, will still be counted as a COVID death even if they had a heart attack or were run over by a bus three months later.
Statistics can do anything:
No male “influenza and pneumonia male deaths” from 2011 to 1015 (red fields)?
No female “chronic lower respiratory diseases” (grey fields) in 2006 and from 2008 to 2011?
Why are women so different to men re. “Dementia and Alzheimers”?
What surprises will we see for 2020 deaths in the UK?
“The most obvious reason COVID-19 hospitalizations are going up is because of what’s happening in the hospital system. Patients are returning to the hospitals for elective surgery that were all delayed during the lockdown.” [j.b. handley blog]
Preventing one infection may cause another one
Exposing our skin to soap and gels, shampoos, deodorants and perfumes results in most of the ingredients being absorbed into the body. Some of the ingredients may have unwanted side effects – they also remove the protective fat layer on the skin (including sunshine induced vitamin D) and lead to the skin being more vulnerable to infections.
and possibly long term health issues from toxic ingredients.
Introducing vaccines and face masks after “it is all over”?
and we are told the vaccine “eradicated” the disease.
Next year the government will claim “wearing face masks prevented the second wave”
Source: NHS England
Wearing face masks
may reduce the virus spread for the moment –
which in the long run weakens our immune system:
the less viruses we are exposed to,
the less ‘exercise’ our immune systems gets.
By comparison: wearing a seat belt saves lives in the long run.
Testing for “cases”? The ‘R’-Value
There is a huge difference between being infected – and being ill.
Healthy people testing positive for coronavirus should not be labelled as “cases”; a case has to be ill or show symptoms. Calling asymptomatic people “a case”, is medically and psychologically wrong.
We could call them “positive people”.
Testing infections in a hospital intensive care unit brings naturally MUCH higher results than tests including the healthy population.
The UK bought 3.5 million test kits for the coronavirus from China and then found out “they are not suitable”. Other European countries reported up to 80% PCR false test result inaccuracies. The list of inaccuracies of the PCR test on Wikipedia is impressively long [May 2020]
In the US, “the sudden jump in cases in February correlates with the emergence of test kits sent out by the CDC. Once those test kits were used up, the number of “cases” again dried up. Then, once test kits became readily available again in early April, the number of cases skyrocketed — as you’d expect. But again, this doesn’t mean the disease was spreading like wildfire….Increased Testing = Increased ‘Cases’”
“The ‘R value’ is not a strong enough number
to bear the burden of any Government policy.”“‘R‘ is an artificial figure calculated using mathematical models which have repeatedly been found to reach wrong-headed conclusions.”
Dr. John Lee
After infection with Covid-19, natural immunity is gained.
“A number of reported cases of coronavirus patients relapsing after overcoming the disease were actually due to testing failures, South Korean scientists say… the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test results for the suspected relapsed patients were false positives, and warned the test it used was not able to distinguish between live traces of the virus and the harmless dead samples which remain after patients have recovered.”
“Researchers at the South Korean centre for disease control and prevention (CDC) now say it is impossible for the COVID-19 virus to reactivate in human bodies.
The CDC added that unlike other viruses,… the coronavirus stays outside of the host cell’s nucleus.”
“This means it does not cause chronic infection or recurrence,” explained Dr Oh Myoung-don, the head of the South Korea’s CDC committee
01/05/2020 – https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/coronavirus/scientists-conclude-people-cannot-get-coronavirus-twice/ar-BB13tl0D
Pandemic reactions out of proportion
Compared to other causes of death and previous pandemics, coronavirus-19 should more be compared to a seasonal flu.
The image below reflects a situation in May, when coronavirus deaths were still high, and they include many cases where people died from other causes but were labelled as covid deaths.
As shown in the previous article, Coronavirus Lockdown was not Necessary. WHY suddenly such a panic with such a huge collateral damage?
“The real question is, is this serious enough to warrant putting most of our population into house imprisonment, wrecking our economy for an indefinite period, destroying businesses that honest and hardworking people have taken years to build up, saddling future generations with debt, depression, stress, heart attacks, suicides and unbelievable distress inflicted on millions of people who are not especially vulnerable, and will suffer only mild symptoms or none at all?” [former Supreme Court Judge , Lord John Sumption, discussing the UK response to COVID-19, BBC interview 2019-03-30 [spiked-online.com]
Examples of collateral lockdown damage:
– a-years-worth-of-suicide-attempts-in-the-last-four-weeks
– doctors-raise-alarm-about-health-effects-of-continued-coronavirus-shutdown
– domestic-violence-surges-seven-hundred-per-cent-uk-coronavirus
The “New normal”?
Computers are taking over our lives in the name of “Health”.
We are all connected – but
our life quality suffers.
Big Brother is watching you.
Freedom in isolation?
The new unnormal is eroding
our society as a well balanced interconnected system of people, groups, clubs, businesses, organisations, and public institutions – a complex network of interwoven connections.
We humans are social animals and need each other’s company.
Learning from History
“DDT is good for me“
Industries have always influenced public health when they could make profit. The officials did get it very wrong in the past. Remember?
“Most doctors smoke Camel”
In 2020, the influence of the pharmaceutical industry on politics, media and the health sector is obvious, when you follow the money.
[source: Daily Mail]
Normally people question their goveernment’s agendas.
Under the spell of FEAR, critical thinking seems to be deactivated
More will be added to this article …
Next article:
we need to focus on the immune system in the next virus season
LINKS:
- COVID-19 Investigation Report – CHALLENGING THE NARRATIVE
- The COVID-19 Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee
- Lockdown Lunacy, J B Handley
- Questions for lockdown apologists (showing lockdown deaths)
- 600-doctors-sign-a-letter-to-president-trump-about-the-mass-casualty-incidents-and-health-effects-due-to-lockdown
- https://the-iceberg.net “What’s Below The Surface”
- How a False Hydroxychloroquine Narrative Was Created
- Dr. Vernon Coleman’s track record of spotting health dangers is second to none: www.vernoncoleman.com/main.htm
- www.ukcolumn.org (news, opinion, subtle dismanteling of BBC manipulation)
- The OFF-Guardian independent former Guardian commentators
- http://inproportion2.talkigy.com shows statistical manipulation
- 20 000 extra deaths in community not explained by covid-19
- 6 minute comedy: George Carlin – Germs, Immune System